Message from @V o x🐵
Discord ID: 662821555188793374
that's not what I mint
Jordan B Petersen's favorite flavor
@SOLO :<
@「SocradeezNuts」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 There are some animals that have higher cognitive function to make faux maneuvers...
Monkeys, corvids, squirrels... (they'll fake hide their food)
right
So even animals *seem capable of lying*
If you think that's functionally equivalent
I think that is
Since that... demonstrates they understand other animals to some extent... and their desire to steal their food
methode i think is making a case for when the animal has language
I think they do...
There's a video you can sort of get at running around an AI program called DeepSqueak
So rats have a patterned chirp/calling
Birds, whales, dolphins
... a vocalization is already an abstract symbol
Chomsky's pretty exclusionary of language
@Deleted User If lack agency, must be exterminated
this ^ seems very problematic for ecological notions. Algae doesn't have agency (normatively) you probably shouldn't be eliminating algae and bacteria
what in the actual fuck
poland is pretty not communist
this is emotivism as well
noncog and emotivism gang is just correct <:Smug:643129431434461194>
Is vs as incoherent
Linguistics do not determine reality... except feeding back on it by impacting our understanding of it
Which is why I'm a linguistic trivialist...
You can call X true of false, it changes nothing about X'ness. It changes your sense of X
Metaphysical trivialism... I might be less willing to jump on board
Since I could only explain that with the phenomenon is a output of the contradictory...
Or thing in itself is nothing. X + not X = object...
I am unwilling to commit to that. Since it's mere possibility
Propositions are non physical <:MonkaS:643820797605183488>
dualism is cringe
@Deleted User It's not a contradiction if it is the case there is a fact of the matter
So it's like saying ... I believe there's a galaxy a thousand light years away
There is a fact of the matter there
Despite not having a referent on hand...
So you're proper or correct in believing it
@LustrousMandrill A meinongian
If you can reference it, it necessarily exists, but not in the same sense
So you equivocating "exist" or "existence"