Message from @sydtko
Discord ID: 662805021137698849
Oh, ok
This guy sounds shockingly like Ratpack
But I don't believe it is because... Ratpack would have to be larping
It fun @sydtko
I hate larpers
I don't think he's larping
He's just stupid and dishonest
Ye I changed his name
that's not what I mint
Jordan B Petersen's favorite flavor
@SOLO :<
@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 There are some animals that have higher cognitive function to make faux maneuvers...
Monkeys, corvids, squirrels... (they'll fake hide their food)
right
So even animals *seem capable of lying*
If you think that's functionally equivalent
I think that is
Since that... demonstrates they understand other animals to some extent... and their desire to steal their food
methode i think is making a case for when the animal has language
I think they do...
There's a video you can sort of get at running around an AI program called DeepSqueak
So rats have a patterned chirp/calling
Birds, whales, dolphins
... a vocalization is already an abstract symbol
Chomsky's pretty exclusionary of language
@Deleted User If lack agency, must be exterminated
this ^ seems very problematic for ecological notions. Algae doesn't have agency (normatively) you probably shouldn't be eliminating algae and bacteria
what in the actual fuck
@「ＳｏｃｒａｄｅｅｚＮｕｔｓ」✓ᴸᵉᵗ ε<0 What's the topic
poland is pretty not communist
this is emotivism as well
noncog and emotivism gang is just correct <:Smug:643129431434461194>
Is vs as incoherent
Linguistics do not determine reality... except feeding back on it by impacting our understanding of it
Which is why I'm a linguistic trivialist...
You can call X true of false, it changes nothing about X'ness. It changes your sense of X
Metaphysical trivialism... I might be less willing to jump on board
Since I could only explain that with the phenomenon is a output of the contradictory...
Or thing in itself is nothing. X + not X = object...
I am unwilling to commit to that. Since it's mere possibility