Message from @Reclan
Discord ID: 664933009182556170
RAWR!!!
*sneazes*
I don't think Pogan is claiming there's a categorical difference, it's just that he wants an argument for the claim "it can be gradual"
he literally is
he claimed there's a distinction between 'little treats' and 'seizure of MOP'
The gradual case is ontologically simpler. Someone would have to demonstrate the mechanism by which the conditional is created
The proletariat can have a little means of production as a treat
just a bit, as a treat
A crumb of MOP
pogan is winning
pog
lol
PoganChamp
<:watching:644902704388505611>
love you reese
lol
🎄
I’m not looking at that
EEEEEEEEEEEE
Don't bully Marcdoof, he's nice
It seems like Pogan is saying that socialism is a binary state, and commieboi is saying the change that precedes the change is gradual.
Like, they're not even disagreeing.
Graph A could be "% of MOP collectivized" and graph b could be "total collectivization of MOP"
sure!
and then he'd be arguing for Graph B!
that we should conceive of seizure as 100%
1: If X occurred in method Y in the past, X can occur in method Y in the future.
2: X occurred in method Y in the past.
3: X can occur in method Y in the future.
appeal to tradition?
What is
thats an ad astra fallacy
milkman fallacy
This is the RBH fallacy
bottom text fallacy