Message from @•Luke•
Discord ID: 664932222976917527
A: If pop vote supports X, X will occur more often than not.
B: More workers in democracy increases pop vote support for X.
C: More workers in democracy increases probability X will occur.
"i'm sure local communities pass legislation via pop vote"
"not talking about social policies"
Democrats in Congress represent the poor more than the rich while Republicans do the reverse: <https://www.nowpublishers.com/article/Details/QJPS-16077> <https://sci-hub.se/10.1561/100.00016077> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/456898615336632320/unknown.png
Democrats in Congress represent the poor; Republicans represent the rich: <http://columbia.edu/~jrl2124/partypurse.pdf> <https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/party-or-the-purse-unequal-representation-in-the-us-senate/286BFEAA039374759DE14D782A0BB8DD> <https://sci-hub.se/10.1017/S0003055419000315> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/456904734708858890/unknown.png
Democrats in Congress represent the middle class more than the rich while Republicans do the reverse: <http://matthewg.org/Gilens-Parties4.pdf> https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/418850379518705675/456900147348242452/unknown.png
<:doobyirl:602961252075175965>
someone asked me to debate!
RAWR!!!
*sneazes*
I don't think Pogan is claiming there's a categorical difference, it's just that he wants an argument for the claim "it can be gradual"
he literally is
he claimed there's a distinction between 'little treats' and 'seizure of MOP'
The gradual case is ontologically simpler. Someone would have to demonstrate the mechanism by which the conditional is created
The proletariat can have a little means of production as a treat
just a bit, as a treat
pogan is winning
pog
lol
PoganChamp
<:watching:644902704388505611>
love you reese
lol
🎄
opting to patronize them smh @actual_communist_boi
I’m not looking at that
EEEEEEEEEEEE
Don't bully Marcdoof, he's nice