Message from @BIRD UP
Discord ID: 664933981367566426
opting to patronize them smh @actual_communist_boi
I’m not looking at that
EEEEEEEEEEEE
Don't bully Marcdoof, he's nice
It seems like Pogan is saying that socialism is a binary state, and commieboi is saying the change that precedes the change is gradual.
Like, they're not even disagreeing.
Graph A could be "% of MOP collectivized" and graph b could be "total collectivization of MOP"
sure!
and then he'd be arguing for Graph B!
that we should conceive of seizure as 100%
1: If X occurred in method Y in the past, X can occur in method Y in the future.
2: X occurred in method Y in the past.
3: X can occur in method Y in the future.
appeal to tradition?
What is
thats an ad astra fallacy
milkman fallacy
This is the RBH fallacy
Check it
RBH
Tbf premise 1 is weirdly phrased
yeah, the language in the syllo is confusing.
<:doobyirl:602961252075175965>
Just change it to "if some method x has achieved some aim y in the past, it is conceivable it could again"
.....
It is just an empirical question
"get destroyed"
LMAO
gotta love pogs
Are they calling the problem of induction the problem of inference?
I don’t know
But that’s a weird thing to pull
what a weaselly little liar dude @actual_communist_boi
So I’d want to say no
weaselly little liar
@actual_communist_boi HEY GET BACK IN THERE
Pogan is winning
Rule following paradox