lmao

and if youre workign in a paradigm of beleifs and views youre going to want to explain the difference between a robot created by a tornado and taking an action

what tf are u on about

and a robot created by a person that can act against the intentions of the person

why.

its an example

because its parsimonious

it's just intuition games

none of this proves intentional realism

👏 Tornado 👏 lives 👏 matter 👏

idk what you mean by prove intentional realism

its just the fallout of working in a paradigm of beliefs and knowledge

word salad

if youre playing the skeptic game then obviously you cant know

i'm a foundationalist

lol

are your foundations material?

I'm just saying what you're on about doesnt work

No of course not

what part doesnt work with which other part

I'm not a cringe materialist

the counter claim against dualism is going to be like substance monism of some kind

I'm a platonist

I deny dualism of the mind

and that view is untennable since it entails a contradiction

what do you think the mind is?

why is that the counter claim to mind body dualism

I think the mind is purely physical

*the usual counter claim

But there is some sui generis interraction between abstracta and the physical mind

why do you think the mind is physical?

what do you mean by physical?

Physical meaning it fits under some naturalistic definition. Obeys some set of laws and such laws are causal

What on earth is the good reason for dualism

if thats what you mean by physicalist then sure the mind is physical

Then what do you mean by physical

and how are you a dualist

because i think theres a dual perspective

sounds like nonsense

there are two kinds of properties. natural properties and non natural properties

if the mind is nonnatural, I take that to mean non physical