its parsimonious with my other views

Kripke fails

what's your argument

this is just vague

do you know the rule following paradox

I dont have some kinda syllogism if thats what youre asking for

Explain how it entails intentional realism

Ah, a fellow goon

tf is a goon

because the way you would distinguish between one system or another would be in virtue of intentions

@LustrousMandrill are u @ing me

@Deleted User why

You're in clubgoon, you should know

lmao

and if youre workign in a paradigm of beleifs and views youre going to want to explain the difference between a robot created by a tornado and taking an action

what tf are u on about

and a robot created by a person that can act against the intentions of the person

why.

its an example

because its parsimonious

it's just intuition games

none of this proves intentional realism

👏 Tornado 👏 lives 👏 matter 👏

idk what you mean by prove intentional realism

its just the fallout of working in a paradigm of beliefs and knowledge

word salad

if youre playing the skeptic game then obviously you cant know

i'm a foundationalist

lol

are your foundations material?

I'm just saying what you're on about doesnt work

No of course not

what part doesnt work with which other part

I'm not a cringe materialist

the counter claim against dualism is going to be like substance monism of some kind

I'm a platonist

I deny dualism of the mind

and that view is untennable since it entails a contradiction

what do you think the mind is?

why is that the counter claim to mind body dualism

I think the mind is purely physical