Rudolf Hess the cat ❤ Official mascot

Maybe they have Heimbachs face as an autozucc now

St. George had bad optics

Rudolf Hess would be a good name for a pet bird. You know, unfortunate flyer now in a cage.

/OurSaint/?

VK?

Gab?

I'm Colton Williams on both.

Given what we know about Jews and especially the recent sex scandals come to light, was Nosferatu literally a kike?

The vampire myth itself even.

Jewish blood libel.

Meh I feel like once our guys have a big enough following on VK and Gab they'll shoah us there too.

The Vampire archtype is most certainly based on kikes.

Archetype*

In some legends vampirism is also an allegory for usury, which is additional support for that idea.

Ugh...

It irks me how many people claim to be fascists and pervert it in to something its not

I am talking to some spergs right now who think that fascism and democracy are compatible, and that the founders were fascists

It could hypothetically be compatible. We elect a man with the vision we want, and give him the power he needs to bring about that vision

In practice, it won't work though

No, fascism is the opposite of democracy, if a leader leads by popular mandate it doesn't make it a democracy.

I mean in the sense that democracy could vote itself into fascism

And yeah, I have been told that Hitler was a populist and whatnot. Some people feel deep ideological thinkers after a few History channel docs.

It won't, but it could

Perhaps, but it could also vote it away, which means in both theory and practice its incompatible

"Fascistic democracy" is democracy in the sense an elective monarchy is a democracy.

The idea is that they vote that power into the hands of the executive, so it wouldn't work in reverse

they would be voting to remove their ability to cancel it

A democracy that would vote itself away. A man can dream...

Like I said, They won't, but they could

I've always been in the RaHoWa camp tbh.

Democracy is an outgrowth of individualism and egalitarianism, so its hardly compatible with fascism

In "Der Nazi-Sozi", the model Dr. Goebbels proposes has democratic elements

The two core tenets of democracy are that A. Each individual gets the same level of influence (1 vote), egalitarianism. B. Each individual has moral agency and worth that makes them suited to influence governmental affairs

Neither of those ideas are compatible with fascism

Namely, a lower house that is democratically elected, the franchise being by occupation

There's also a Senate, whose members are appointed from among the elite by the Dictator

Dude this is gr88

Fascism is about subordinating yourself and your interests to the good of the nation. It puts the individual last when it comes to social organization.

The NS Parliament, however, is purely economic

Wait wtf I was replying to something else

```
Instead of democracy’s parliamentary system, we will have an economic parliamentof the National Socialist state. It will be chosen by the totality of the working German people. Everyone will have a vote. This election, however, will not involve parliamentary parties, but rather by the great professions within the people’s community. German professions are organized down to the smallest detail, and provide the guarantee that each working German will have the right to have his will, his accomplishments, and his responsibility taken into consideration by the state. The economic parliament will manage economic policy, not state policy.

That will be managed by the Senate. It will consist of about 200 personalities, chosen by the dictator from all groups and classes. It will lead the state. These 200 will be the elite from the whole people. They will provide the government with advice and support. They will be appointed for life. In the event of death, another will be appointed.

The senate will select the chancellor. He will have full responsibility for the whole policy of the Reich, both domestic and foreign. He will be ready to give his life for that policy if necessary.

The chancellor will choose his ministers and officials. He will also have full responsibility over them, which means he can appoint and fire them at will.

```