It is too complex for masses.
i mean if a human can write something a human can understand it
it's not like the "masses" are animals that need to be lead by a shepherd.
@post-ironic username Not true. Human needs 20 years to better understand a thing.
Masses do not have so much time.
to focus on it for 20 years?
where did this number come from?
It is my personal feeling how it is. Marxism is complex. You study it more than 10 years before writing.
"It is my personal feeling how it is"
isn't this literally feels before reals?
Someone with 15-25 years in philosophy can write Marxist language.
couldn't the population, if it was simply a matter of decisionmaking instead of writing, read some kind of reductionist summary?
You are negligent thinking too much of masses.
Masses have to invest large amount of studying before they understand Marxist.
They don't have time
For this
The best should be the leader.
couldn't you incorporate it into school education then
Yes.
that's 12 years
or however long you want
Not enough in this age.
This age person is not developed completely to work like that with abstractions.
If it is possible it should be done.
proof?
i thought abstract thinking develops around age 12 or so
I thought around zero percent of people been inventive at that age.
there are quite a few young inventors. in fact, that's when people start being inventive, although at that age they don't have the economic means to do anything with those ideas.
They have zero experience with inventions and stuff.
Zero experience, no brain developed.
Worst candidate to participate in elections.
that's when they start learning though, and are able to grasp those kind of concepts.
obviously i don't think 12 year olds should vote
but i don't think you have to be 30 years old or something to understand marxism either.
Most people do not grow up even.
Discord is a proof.
lol no but seriously
Most of people here.
^
like im pretty sure unless you're diseased
