Message from @Alpha
Discord ID: 328985802174365696
*called it and suffered because of it*
*along with his ideology*
yes
Than there are differences. What other differences do you know?
size and strenght
that
Is there more people in NK or USSR?
USSR i think.. but dude what is your point?
Point is to use abstractions to see the differences in the socialist countries. To have a better knowledge about them. Knowledge is necessary.
Just saying free market is the best known to man
If we stay on the topic we can proceed with getting knowledge about the subject that you picked.
If you are interested.
alan, just because the anglo-american capitalist empire is extremely powerful does not make it right
when it comes to political theory, might does not make right
but in raw politics, sometimes the opposite is the case
they have their own agenda
but thats the thing, what we read in the west about venezuela is inflected by capitalist propaganda
@Alpha We have to compare socialist countries with socialist. To know the differences in their systems.
we see the nation through the lens of their (capitalist) interests
agree
but the free market is necessary you can have socialism. but also free market
well I don't disagree with that necessarily
socialists usually call it "free association"
Lets not change the subject please as we didn't find any knowledge yet on the previous subject. Would you like to investigate on the differences of socialist states?
because "markets" are taken to imply
that there are still financial markets, ownership of stocks/bonds/commodities by indiviiduals
my point is
I'll be here
For you.
that with pure socialism you cant go so far
Alan this piece by Schweickart is pretty close to what a good "transitional program" should be....and strictly speaking its a kind of market socialism