and that's not even including soviet production/storage of any machines or vehicles

dont forget the newer technology

that's the US's entire shipments vs soviet raw materials alone

were there any soviet troops armed with thompson machine guns on the front lines?

which greatly helped moscow and stalingrad during winter

any shermans on the eastern front?

No? But many others

Better tanks for sure

the majority of the US's shipped tanks were shermans

4000 out of 7000

So then there was

1300 of the other tanks were M3 lees

and it doesn't say here what the remaining 1700 were

now the sherman is a medium tank

m3 lees were pretty good

so let's compare it with the most-produced soviet tank

so was the m3

the T-34

Like I said, doesnt matter

you said the technology was better

and that they were better tanks

if we compare the tanks, then we can find if those claims are true

I am testing your claim

it bought them time so did winter

Im not saying it won the war

you said that the tanks were better than the soviet ones

America won the war

and?

so just fuck all the stats, america first

Well logically american tanks are better than soviet tanks

let's examine that claim

especially back then

the T-34 weighed 3 tons less than the sherman at 26 tons

And?

the T-34 had a larger gun by 1.3 mm

Was it more resistant?

let me see here

it lists a range from 13 to 108 mm for the sherman

let's say about 60 mm

that sound fair?

A direct comparison is rife with issues. Simply put, the tanks were designed around different philosophies and uses. The Sherman was more robust from a mechanical standpoint; the T-34 was an atrocious mechanical contraption. Each design was improved by sub-marks through its history and both remained in active service around the world well into the 1960s and 1970s (and even later in limited appearances with the T-34 in Africa, for example).

Addressing your specific request:

Survivability - call it even. Both were typical of the time period. The Shermans infamously brewed up due to inadequate fire prevention measures with ammunition storage that was addressed in later marks. The T-34 and its vaunted frontal sloped armor was largely impervious to direct front shots, but if penetrated was just as likely to catch fire or explode.