what is victimization defined as in this context

can we get a link to the study

@Deleted User Guess i'm done, as I', just going to ask you to read an economics textbook or research into economics

It is defined as being the victim of a crime. @Deleted User cannot read.

any economist who knows what they're talking about would side with me

yeah but I still want a link

Sure.

like virtually all of them

I'm not going to have faith in an economic phenomenon that existed simply because you said it did. If you don't have any evidence, then you're done. I'm not going to take your word for it.

graphs is literally /pol/ tier arguements

https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/hpnvv0812.pdf

Go read it yourself.

I don't see how my word for it plays a part

competition increasing produciton is obvious

as does automation

like what planet do you live on

That's all you have to work with. You don't have any evidence to back up your claims. Now you're making it seem like that was your argument. It wasn't.. And we all know it wasn't. Nice try but you won't weasel your way outta this one.

yeah I'm gonan be honest this study clearly supports @Anarchist-Communist here

okay I guess I didn't escape your grasp?

Lol

I believe miscommunication is at fault in this situation

like it says if you are poor and not white you're more likely to be a victim of a crime

Instead of just admitting that you were mistaken, you chalk it up to a simple case of "miscommunication". Nice.

Competition doesn't increase production, demand does

Yeah because I know i'm right

Sure you are.

and virtually any economist would tell you that

Oh, I'm sure they would.

@Anarchist-Communist Hmm, now this is interesting, I read the whole document top to bottom, and all it mentions is VICTIMIZATION, NOT who is actually COMITTING the crime, not to mention that they were REPORTS to police, there was nothing mentioning whether or not they were legitimate or not.

interjecting thanks

@nerd where is this site?

http://politiscales.net @RobotWizard

@Anarchist-Communist If you were trying to convey that the poor were more likely to commit and be victimized by crime, then congratulstions, you succeeded.

Dude.

Admit to being wrong.

Holy shit.

what was the argument

@Anarchist-Communist I do admit that I jumped the gun on this, but it does not excuse that you were also incorrect.

@Deleted User https://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/09/economic-history-2

there is about two different ones going on atm

here, i'll stoop to your level