Illustrates my point

brb a sec

That it isnt universal

blicky got the stiffy uh

So why are you still arguing

UH

Ok Im back

Clapping cheeks to gummo is my city

I'm not you

Free speech doesn't selectively allow certain things over others

Except I've illustrated it does.

<:bour:313709044957315082> when you realize scarcity is not a myth

When?

We've "legally" violated free speech in the US throughout the red scare, we're doing it right now with political prisoners, immigrants, etc.

We also do it legally on a daily basis

With literal law

Which laws?

This isnt something you can claim isnt real when its written into the legal code of every state on earth

And holy shit

I already said libel,

Ad restrictions

Etc

I've given you the list

Like I said you're allowed speak it. Just not threaten.

Already

No, you aren't

Writing or showing is a different story

You literally are not allowed to take part in libel

And no, it isnt

Holy shit

Do you know what libel is?

That's threatening to a person

No it isnt

Its slander.

Its literally JUST slander

And it's meant to protect business

Which can ruin the person's reputation and that's threatening to the person

The same way copyright is used to protect business

Copyright also, isnt anything to do with a threat

But again, a form of limiting speecg

They're written into law and you inherently benefit from them, we all do, and you're claiming they somehow aren't real