Oh you mean

However, the rule of law ensures that we are treated equally.

I see what you mean

why should we be treated equally though if we know we arent equal?

Because that's fair.

Like being born into wealth or poverty, a geographic region, etc. will create inequality

That's what allows for checks and balances.

Uhhh

Market socialist

Inequality is naturally created, however, the law is supposed to even the playing field of life.

Could we have a Romanian chat?

How would you prevent inequality from further expanding?

It's all about order through balance.

so what youre saying is government should be used to create equal opportunity where there is none?

The faithful execution of law prevents inequality from expanding.

@Bamboo Tu es francais?

@Denning Yes, that's the duty of government.

racism can be considered a natural thing tho

@America Billiards No

Awww

does government have other duties?

Of course.

Sorry mate

Maintain an Army and a Navy, faithfully execute law, protect people's rights, etc.

the very nature of a military implies loyalty

Overall, government duty is to provide opportunity to those who don't have many,

so your proposed state would still be hierarchical

Only if the military ruled.

My proposed state would be constitutional.

is this acceptable despite the threat of inequality?

No hierarchy.

There will always be a threat of inequality.

Through a constitutional state, that threat will be minimized.

why exist with the threat when you can eliminate it entirely tho
constitutional states don't really last

but constitutions have historically more served to guarantee the rights of those in power than the other way around

You can't eliminate inequality though

They will last if you enforce the law faithfully.

It's all about maintaining a republic.

what would this constitution look like?

How do you ensure the law is enforced though?

It's in plain writ.