racism can be considered a natural thing tho

why exist with the threat when you can eliminate it entirely tho
constitutional states don't really last

words on parchment don't mean anything if you don't have people to represent it

what if those people take more power for themselves
the way you're describing it is very anarchic to say the least

to me this sounds like dressing up anarchism and calling it something else

same honestly

so they have power

but at the same time

they don't

this sounds very odd

words on parchment don't mean anything if you don't have anyone enforcing it
a constitution only had power if they have people who enforce it

that makes

no sense

you're dressing up anarchism

but they don't have
any power to enforce that so

this is actually anarchism dressed up
or very left libertarianism

Stable

how can it be stable if you have no vanguard or people running the damn thing

The people

same

the people could be corrupted you shill

but if the people have basically have the same power as say the government
they can be corrupted

corrupt people can exist without a democracy

but there is
the people can be the fruit
how will they not thrive

I'm anti NATO
Anti globalism in general

It shouldn't be attempted
internationalism is a waste of time and resources that only destroys cultures tbh

@Deleted User what's your opinion on Franco

that doesn't answer my question