is this acceptable despite the threat of inequality?

No hierarchy.

There will always be a threat of inequality.

Through a constitutional state, that threat will be minimized.

why exist with the threat when you can eliminate it entirely tho
constitutional states don't really last

but constitutions have historically more served to guarantee the rights of those in power than the other way around

You can't eliminate inequality though

They will last if you enforce the law faithfully.

It's all about maintaining a republic.

what would this constitution look like?

How do you ensure the law is enforced though?

It's in plain writ.

Direct democracy in the republic?

No democracy.

Only a constitutional republic.

words on parchment don't mean anything if you don't have people to represent it

Wait so how does that work>

so how is the government determined?

If presented, the people would prefer a constitutional republic.

It gives the people the power.

Government then become representational extensions of the people.

Wait but people don't vote?

Or the people act as their own representatives?

The people act as their own representation.

how do you stop representatives from becoming a class of their own?

Voting is pointless for the most part.

Nice

politics as an industry the way we see today?

We do away with representatives.

No the people are their own representatives

how does this work then?

direct democracy is the only way

Fuck that.

Direct democracy is nothing more than capitalism.

Then how?

Constitutional republic only.

In which there are no representatives.

what if those people take more power for themselves
the way you're describing it is very anarchic to say the least

so anarchy but its still called a government?

how does the government exercise power and through what?

We already have anarchy which is called government.