amendment*

@Comrade Skeltal Fair enough. But I mean it's still illegal for them to do it to their own people. If caught they would suffer the consequences.

Sure it's illegal

which is literally in place

But they don't face consequences

The state decides what's illegal and when

so the people can defend themselves from the government

If they were exposed to the public they would

Under 18 USC SS 240-1, limiting or infringing on rights is a felony.

They have been

That makes government a criminal syndicate.

which is why americans should have guns

If the government dissolved there wouldn't be any crimes because there wouldn't be laws

The public isnt the arbiter of law and justice

@fannybandit literal meme

well states limit the second amendment p severely

@prior I said federal government.

Not local.

look at NY and Cali

@prior technically

lol

its true

without a government there wouldnt be a crime

If all laws were the opposite of what they are, and we had no idea of the present laws, would the constitutions still convey justice?

Yea but thats not illegal Waifu

As decided by the state

It's better to have no one rule rather than the lawless rule.

So what's your point

What is justice

The rule of law under due process is all we need.

if limiting the right

is illegal

@Mainrato Depends. I'd say sometimes.

The entire point is that states "break laws", bend them, and determine when laws exist or don't

than it shouldnt matter

And the state determined you can limit that right

So what are you going to do about it

My point is, in the interests of peace, prosperity, and justice...the federal government must be abolished.

thats unconstitutional

Said who?

Which is within the people's rights to do.