@Deleted User Compared to traditional weapons yes

You mean... being gay? dude, the romans sucked dick.

strength amongst men means strength of the household and nation

Lol

Romans also fucked dudes.

No romans were amazing

Are nukes overpowered

they were also very accepting towards gays

Julias Cesar even fucked a dude.

Everyone should have a small arsenal

Romans were gay as shit.

Lmao

Me smash nigger me win

You lose

And Greeks had tiny peniis

this guy gets it

its just 2 + 2

Is 4

So what @styles wants is a hyper-masculine and also hyper-gay type of culture.

And also maybe mistreating northern europeans.

It's not gay if you are the one putting it in

@Anarchist-Communist Nigger stop using ad hominems

That's how many regressive cultures justify fucking child abuse

And strawmanning him

lol

he is already clearly seen as a pseudo intellectual from overuse of terms

And raping suspected gays

if u only have terms to describe your opinion then you have no opinion at all

you are just forming your opinion as a clone of another's

Bet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Rome

It's not an adhominem

Or is that more college as research?

lol

At worst a strawman

I mean, if you are for homosexuality I guess that is fine.

@Anarchist-Communist He's not fond of "modern American college theory studies".

sexuality isnt politics

But Roman Masculinity was probably not what you think. They also saw pants as uncivilized.

What