Perhaps it will take a lot of brain surgery and removal of parts of the brain and replacements.

Perhaps some better alternatives.

Which psychiatric professional understands the future of technology and can fully imagine medical advancement?

That sounds like an astronomical waste of time and money. Not to mention unrealistic and cruel and not bound to be achievable any time soon.

Still achievable

I don't care how much it costs

Or how much you think it wastes

Are you going to front the bill?

People shouldn't be killing people

No of course not.

I'm just stating my opinion.

At least you understand it's possible.

Some people do not deserve to live. And some people do not deserve to live in pain.

Says who?

Says anyone that is rational and caring.

Many who are rational and caring would disagree with you.

Because with life there is both pain and pleasure.

You are not in a place to determine who gets to live or die.

Nor am I obviously.

And I believe nobody is.

What you don't seem to realize is that your grand ideas are not only unrealistic, they're harmful. But regardless, this conversation won't be going in a worthwhile direction anytime soon. You're free to believe as you wish.

How is it unrealistic?

Or harmful?

When it can treat people and prevent people from creating mass genocide?

How do you know in 20 years psychopathy won't be completely eradicated simply because lots of people studied psychopaths?

that's unlikely

but I believe it to be possible

I've already stated how they're unrealistic given our current understanding of neuroscience and psychology, and I've also made it pretty clear how they could be unnecessarily cruel and anti-progressive. What it comes down to though is this: not everyone is treatable. And simply studying someone's behavior won't lead to the eradication of psychopathy, that is such a blatantly absurd belief to hold.

Guys I found a server to visit today https://discord.gg/aNkrwUK

Yes it's unrealistic with our CURRENT understanding. Not our advanced and future understanding.

It could be but it will most likely be a lot more progressive as these studies has helped people who are less fucked up.

How do you know it won't work?

You think far too highly of people in general and too little of scientific theory.

@Firefly look i condemn that server

No I understand scientific theory

monothiestic religions and lgbt contradict each other

thats like calling ham halal

Otherwise I wouldn't be so confident in the advancement of our science.

@F0X~{A Walker} True.

Depends on the religion though.

Some religions don't mind the LGBT