Because what i said is true striking doesn't cause a significant amount of harm

Unless you like profit

:'(

I've been involved with a strike that included over 100k strikers. Not one was sacked for striking.

No but it could very well get you fired

100k isnt nationwide

maybe city wide

it is in the UK, where I am.

Oh but buy is talking about the US

There is a nationwide strike going on in the UK as we speak.

Nobody has been fired.

Because of snow I assume?

No, lecturers are striking and university staff across the country.

For what reason?

That is because US is brainwashed sadly

Pension plans are being altered to put pensions in the stock market.

I see.

Public workers striking is literally illegal in several states

That's why I think a lot will be fired if they were on a strike

West Virginia had a state wide teacher strike though recently

If it was nationwide

No one fired

that's in west virginia

not nationwide

thats statewide

Yes

I'd assume a lot of people would probably get fired if it was nationwide but that would depend on how long the strike is

If the work force is having a nation wide strike who are you going to hire?

Teachers striked for a week and a half

It was great

Nobody. They'd fire the ones working and not fire the ones who arent working

Oh for only a week and a half

then I doubt they'd get fired

Teachers

Dont see what's great about teachers striking

They can't afford to live

Higher ed workers are too valuable to fire.

Many can

And state chooses not to fund it

Then you're deluded.

So they're not too valuable?