You're asserting the impossible in an abstract vacuum in which you deny the very nature of the state

Y u do dis

and imagination of course

Im not denying what you think is the state

Not what I think is the state, what the state is,

And you are.

No.

I didnt disagree

@Mr. X What does that even mean? It means nothing.

I only disagreed to what little power you think people hold compared to the state

@Deleted User I disagree. It means a lot

I dont think they hold little power, I said that power isnt of a nonviolent nature.

@Mr. X I don't think he believes that people have little power.

Because it isn't, and never has been.

I disagree

I believe he is trying to say that the method you're championing has little power.

Yes but you're wrong lmao

If attacking people is your only power then you have little power

So the state has little power?

Really?

@Deleted User Maybe, but its a good alternative

No

That's what you've just articulated

well compared to the people yes

Lmao

Shenanigans

@Mr. X You need to read "State and Revolution".

No.

Suit yourself. You're missing out. Plenty of non-Marxists would agree.

Good for them.

I just disagree with them.

@Mr. X You would learn a lot from it.

It's free online.

https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1917/staterev/

I do not agree with such ideas.

But atleast now I see why you don't believe me.

How unfortunate.

Superiority complex x10

God*

@Mr. X You don't agree? I figured that. Your opinions on the state are of little to no value.

I am god.