and again, even if it would have managed to raise to 2,0, which it won't, it won't fill the demographic holes that are already present

so yeah you need those 20 yo men from syria and iraq <:haha:318675605233336330>

those holes are temporary

3 or 4 generations are nothing

then you will face collapse of your social system within one generation

when boomers retire

not enough money for pensioners

pensioners die

oh right 🤦

new demographic is adjusted to itself

dude

w/e

we didnt have this problem 40 years ago

its not like browns are needed

you dont treat symptoms

you treat illnesses

accepting immigrants in your country is colonialism

you strip their country of origin of some of their best or most well off people

Abdul the goat farmer isnt gonna migrate

but Mohammed the urbanite with an actual economic worth might

and the uni students too

if you are a socialist and are pro-humanity and care about other countries you should be against immigration

>we didnt have this problem 40 years ago
because your demographic was better

now it's bad and you can't do anything about it other than immigration pretty much

and why do you think our demographic was better

@Swiss Dave many countries have a big "surplus" of people

we have a deficit of them

its a natural balancing act

im trying my best not to get angry right now

you did not tackle my actual point

if more bengali come here it will be better for both europe and bangladesh

If all of the bengalese people with business, money, education move from bengal to here, it's only good for us

prove that point then

and very bad for bengal

if those are people with the greatest worth why do they do so bad when coming here

and are the lower middle class at best

it's bad for bengal

they do bad because integration is difficult

no i dont accept your point at all