Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 436632804697047044


2018-04-19 20:49:56 UTC  

Sorry i thought it was you yung

2018-04-19 20:50:10 UTC  

You would be Mr. E in disguise. Mr. E-formers, autist in disguise. Mr. E-formers, sucking off some guys.

2018-04-19 20:50:39 UTC  

Good english

2018-04-19 20:50:44 UTC  

I do english to

2018-04-19 20:50:57 UTC  

Its because of your aspergers

2018-04-19 20:51:25 UTC  

Languages are really hard for people with aspergers cuz its involves social skills

2018-04-19 20:51:39 UTC  

@yung Lel. Anyone with a background in philosophy would tell you otherwise. Chomsky was way out of his league. Foucault laid a subtle smackdown on Chomskys naive ass. Funny how a supposed ML would support Chomsky and his hooman naytur argument.

2018-04-19 20:52:19 UTC  

Ml

2018-04-19 20:52:20 UTC  

Whats that

2018-04-19 20:52:49 UTC  

I suggest you watch that debate again and observe how Foucault outwits the fuck out of the pseudo-philosopher Garden Gnome Chomsky.

2018-04-19 20:52:56 UTC  

Also anyone with a background in philosophy knows that this <- is not a valid argument

2018-04-19 20:54:29 UTC  

Unless you support that analytical dog doody. That scientistic, overly-mathematical anglo garbage that passes as philosophy.

2018-04-19 20:54:44 UTC  

Again

2018-04-19 20:54:46 UTC  

Nobody cares

2018-04-19 20:56:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/436631165496066058/vtaspc.jpg

2018-04-19 20:56:38 UTC  

I dont even know what you are talking about

2018-04-19 20:58:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/436631609609814026/e474ee1d39dd8fe0b07669619576c7cd.png

2018-04-19 20:58:34 UTC  

You need to read Foucault.

2018-04-19 20:59:18 UTC  

Its about semantics

2018-04-19 20:59:26 UTC  

Its inherently uninteresting

2018-04-19 21:02:52 UTC  

Foucault is not simply worried about semantics. He does talk at length about discursive formations, as you can read in his famous work "The Archaeology of Knowledge" but his bread and butter imo, which places him well above Chomsky in regards to critical social analysis, would be power-relations.

2018-04-19 21:03:09 UTC  

Blablabla

2018-04-19 21:03:37 UTC  

Fringe pseudoscience for bitter nerds

2018-04-19 21:04:09 UTC  

Face the fact: Chomsky is a good thinker, but Foucault was great.

2018-04-19 21:04:28 UTC  

Chomsky is a good actor

2018-04-19 21:04:37 UTC  

Foucault is irrelevant

2018-04-19 21:04:56 UTC  

Irrelevant? Maybe in a few hundred years. Probably not though. Lel

2018-04-19 21:05:16 UTC  

Only you and three other students care

2018-04-19 21:05:55 UTC  

Nah brah. Postmodern philosophy drops panties. Women love to hear about Foucault.

2018-04-19 21:06:05 UTC  

Postmodernism lol

2018-04-19 21:07:10 UTC  

Yeah. Philosophers like Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, etc.

2018-04-19 21:08:10 UTC  

I've noticed that Derrida is a real crowd-pleaser with the ladies.

2018-04-19 21:08:26 UTC  

Yeah maybe it would be if yiu wernt 129 kilos

2018-04-19 21:10:02 UTC  

I'm barely pushing 200. Nice projection though you basement-dwelling whaleman.

2018-04-19 21:11:08 UTC  

Go back to the Jordan Peterson videos you reactionary Shitlord. Leave the philosophizing to people that can actually comprehend French postmodern theory.

2018-04-19 21:11:22 UTC  

Postmodernism lol

2018-04-19 21:11:31 UTC  

You also love adorno I reckon

2018-04-19 21:11:57 UTC  

Adorno is a beast. The Frankfurt School has produced some spicy shit.

2018-04-19 21:12:35 UTC  

Adorno is an idiot

2018-04-19 21:12:47 UTC  

His composition is horrible aswell

2018-04-19 21:14:57 UTC  

His theory-game was as strong as his dick-game. And the guy was a child prodigy, he was playing Beethoven before he was old enough to bust a nut.