Please sthap offending me

Im also leftist I am verr sensitive

Go back to that safe space you right-wing turd. And then pretend like you aren't a fragile little snowflake.

Which safe space

Your mother's uterus.

Ahh

Who are you

Ni🇧 🇧 a who da fuck is you?

@yung

Oh no

<@417576313474383882> e

Ah its e

The autist

Foucault got ass pounded in that debate

Sorry i thought it was you yung

You would be Mr. E in disguise. Mr. E-formers, autist in disguise. Mr. E-formers, sucking off some guys.

Good english

I do english to

Its because of your aspergers

Languages are really hard for people with aspergers cuz its involves social skills

@yung Lel. Anyone with a background in philosophy would tell you otherwise. Chomsky was way out of his league. Foucault laid a subtle smackdown on Chomskys naive ass. Funny how a supposed ML would support Chomsky and his hooman naytur argument.

Ml

Whats that

I suggest you watch that debate again and observe how Foucault outwits the fuck out of the pseudo-philosopher Garden Gnome Chomsky.

Also anyone with a background in philosophy knows that this <- is not a valid argument

Unless you support that analytical dog doody. That scientistic, overly-mathematical anglo garbage that passes as philosophy.

Again

Nobody cares

I dont even know what you are talking about

You need to read Foucault.

Its about semantics

Its inherently uninteresting

Foucault is not simply worried about semantics. He does talk at length about discursive formations, as you can read in his famous work "The Archaeology of Knowledge" but his bread and butter imo, which places him well above Chomsky in regards to critical social analysis, would be power-relations.

Blablabla

Fringe pseudoscience for bitter nerds

Face the fact: Chomsky is a good thinker, but Foucault was great.

Chomsky is a good actor

Foucault is irrelevant

Irrelevant? Maybe in a few hundred years. Probably not though. Lel