Message from @supermodel ruben

Discord ID: 436629726736678922


2018-04-19 20:45:28 UTC  

You go around picking up hookers because you're unable to connect intimately with females, and you suffer from a serious case of premature ejaculation.

2018-04-19 20:45:56 UTC  

Okay

2018-04-19 20:46:52 UTC  

Oh sorry you thought I care

2018-04-19 20:47:03 UTC  

You a straight B I T C H ni🇧:regional_indicator_b: a

2018-04-19 20:47:04 UTC  

Please sthap offending me

2018-04-19 20:47:21 UTC  

Im also leftist I am verr sensitive

2018-04-19 20:47:59 UTC  

Go back to that safe space you right-wing turd. And then pretend like you aren't a fragile little snowflake.

2018-04-19 20:48:08 UTC  

Which safe space

2018-04-19 20:48:17 UTC  

Your mother's uterus.

2018-04-19 20:48:21 UTC  

Ahh

2018-04-19 20:48:27 UTC  

Who are you

2018-04-19 20:48:56 UTC  

Ni🇧 🇧 a who da fuck is you?

2018-04-19 20:49:10 UTC  
2018-04-19 20:49:13 UTC  

Oh no

2018-04-19 20:49:16 UTC  

<@417576313474383882> e

2018-04-19 20:49:19 UTC  

Ah its e

2018-04-19 20:49:24 UTC  

The autist

2018-04-19 20:49:51 UTC  

Foucault got ass pounded in that debate

2018-04-19 20:49:56 UTC  

Sorry i thought it was you yung

2018-04-19 20:50:10 UTC  

You would be Mr. E in disguise. Mr. E-formers, autist in disguise. Mr. E-formers, sucking off some guys.

2018-04-19 20:50:39 UTC  

Good english

2018-04-19 20:50:44 UTC  

I do english to

2018-04-19 20:50:57 UTC  

Its because of your aspergers

2018-04-19 20:51:25 UTC  

Languages are really hard for people with aspergers cuz its involves social skills

2018-04-19 20:51:39 UTC  

@yung Lel. Anyone with a background in philosophy would tell you otherwise. Chomsky was way out of his league. Foucault laid a subtle smackdown on Chomskys naive ass. Funny how a supposed ML would support Chomsky and his hooman naytur argument.

2018-04-19 20:52:19 UTC  

Ml

2018-04-19 20:52:20 UTC  

Whats that

2018-04-19 20:52:49 UTC  

I suggest you watch that debate again and observe how Foucault outwits the fuck out of the pseudo-philosopher Garden Gnome Chomsky.

2018-04-19 20:52:56 UTC  

Also anyone with a background in philosophy knows that this <- is not a valid argument

2018-04-19 20:54:29 UTC  

Unless you support that analytical dog doody. That scientistic, overly-mathematical anglo garbage that passes as philosophy.

2018-04-19 20:54:44 UTC  

Again

2018-04-19 20:54:46 UTC  

Nobody cares

2018-04-19 20:56:22 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/436631165496066058/vtaspc.jpg

2018-04-19 20:56:38 UTC  

I dont even know what you are talking about

2018-04-19 20:58:07 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/308950154222895104/436631609609814026/e474ee1d39dd8fe0b07669619576c7cd.png

2018-04-19 20:58:34 UTC  

You need to read Foucault.

2018-04-19 20:59:18 UTC  

Its about semantics

2018-04-19 20:59:26 UTC  

Its inherently uninteresting

2018-04-19 21:02:52 UTC  

Foucault is not simply worried about semantics. He does talk at length about discursive formations, as you can read in his famous work "The Archaeology of Knowledge" but his bread and butter imo, which places him well above Chomsky in regards to critical social analysis, would be power-relations.

2018-04-19 21:03:09 UTC  

Blablabla

2018-04-19 21:03:37 UTC  

Fringe pseudoscience for bitter nerds