Look it up yourself, cba to look for one now

Im getting dinner atm

Argue for yourself pal, just because you don't have any evidence to prove your claim, does not mean the burden of researching should fall on me.

Fuck it dude, here's a citation. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2156010-we-may-know-why-younger-brothers-are-more-likely-to-be-gay/

But yeah I do have evidence. I just couldn't be assed as you could see here.

2 points to me I guess.

It was a simple google search too. Something you could've done in a few seconds without my help.

That's 3.

@Mr. X What? This just states that a scientist thinks that you are more likely to be genetically gay in todays age after he did a study off of 132 women, and found that the gay children had more antibodies in them, this dosen't help your claim at all.

Fucking read the articles you cherry pick.

Gee I wonder why people in that field think that.

Yhea, I wonder.

But yes it does help my claim.

If it harmed humanity then we would be adapted to this so they wouldnt be more likely to be gay.

How does it help your claim?

I just told you.

And yes, it does harm humanity, because if what you claim is true, it would drive reproduction rates through the floor, and woulf lead to tiny populations.

In small populations yes. We don't live in small populations though.

There's billions of us.

But you claimed it was naturally occuring, which means it would have had origins in the original humans, in which there was around under a million worldwide.

Lol this debate

No it doesn't.

Homosexuality is cultural

End.

It means it was adapted over time.

And before humans came into existence

since it's natural in animals too.

@supermodel ruben No

Yes

No

Educate yourself

I did

Dumb fucking piece of shit

@supermodel ruben What the fuck....

Lit

Every mamal is bi-sexual

LOL

Is this guy having a mental breakdown?

Guess Im a reptile then

@Deleted User Probably

why is this guy replying to himself