Are you sure? You took a nazi's word seriously when he called me a jew.

I mean that's pretty retarded.

Well I didn't know otherwise.

So you took a nazis word for it.

You never said whether you were jewish or not befire.

Brilliant.

I said I was agnostic plenty of times.

You still took a nazis word for it lol.

Fuck this. If it boils down to arguing about whether or not I'm retarded just because I believe in a fringe ideology then it's not worth anything.

It does if the ideology is retarded.

Like communism.

No ideology can be "retarded". That's like saying that you're a retard for liking a certain resteraunt over another.

No plenty of ideologies are retarded. Same for restaurants

I'd rather be served in a fancy restaurant over a restaurant where there's cockroaches in my drink.

Has anyone ever called you cringy or cancerous Mosin?

Too many caps.

I see

Yes Mr. E plenty have.

Not surprised.

Mhm

Why is subjunctive value bad?

Ad hominem is only bad if its not relating to the argument.

So if a man kills a jew for one reason and not because of anti semitism then it's not anti semitism.

But if a nazi does it then its most likely because he's a nazi.

It's simple.

@maostravelagent E is racially jewish, not religiously, but he seems to not be able to get that concept through his thick inbred skull.

@Mosin Nagant hi

Possibly like 2%. I mean I've even said I was possibly 2% jewish. So yeah, who's the inbred now?

>five blocked messages

2 sjws.

>ten blocked messages ^___^

Still 2 sjws.

See? Communists and liberals are very alike.

Why is subjunctive value bad?

It's not.

Unless it's too unrealistic.

If you want you can just depend on religion for that.

if it leads you to doing something morally wrong then obviously don't value it.

Religion can be a grey area for that a lot. Sometimes even black or white.

@Aidan xD LTV and SV aren't mutually exclusive