Message from @Techpriest of house Roundeye
Discord ID: 669026925464780803
yeah sure, i agree
both optics and respectability are important, we shouldn't downplay either
I agree as well
Optics and Respectability are one in the same in my mind
thinking about it now, optics could be a part of respectability
Respectability is everything
optics is your choice of aesthetics, wording, culture, and looks
people judge on that, and if they judge you bad, your respectability is damaged, no?
the right is not respectable by the enemy, but we could be respectable for some near the middle
It only matters if that is actually what you are.
If its just a look (which 90% of people view optics as) then your wasting your time.
i think looks can reflect the soul of the thing
wignats show what they feel and act
Humans are highly visually driven creatures
how you dress is a form of art in my eyes, which is why we need more art
Hawaiian shirt nationalism?
hah lmao
i mean, not my favorite, but if it works
And even then though it may be called Optics, it’s much more than just a look
It’s the words you choose
@Zemo the result is the same as a wignat, you get called a racist or are just not shown on media.
But see thats actually what you are.
You actually believe that putting on a suit has intrinsic artistic or aesthetic value outside of putting on a show.
In that case optics are relevant because you want to portray something that you want others to emulate and you adhere to
yeah, that's exactly why i think they are important
The cycle of events is the same, but the results may vary. Being called racist isn’t the end, the end is whether or not the public believes it
or your message is so milktoast you might as well be a republican.
i dont think wignats put on a show, i think they are expressing their views
feds put on a show
The feds and the media control the frame though so they can put on a show and people believe it. They dont play by the normal rules because they are leagues above us in power.
Sadly its not 1:1
@NeoFuturist Okay, I think we are agreeing about the usefulness of optics. Why do we have a disagreement? Is it because of semantics or the definition?
i have no idea
it could be optics is a late argument. it was with the alt-right that it started appearing
at least as far as I know
i don't see McFansy or anyone here shaving their head, throwing on boots, dressing in black, and waving swastikas in some autistic small pp energy rally
so for us it isn't really an argument
wignats finna be wignats