Message from @ApplicationBot
Discord ID: 467291232520110110
I'm against objectively deciding what speech you can use violence against and which not
Or if someone talks shit to you just ignore them. No need to beat them up
It's free speech both ways
Which is?
Free speech means the state can't shut it because they have it on a list
Individuals are free to shut your speech if they wish
Sure
shut my speech as in ignore or prevent me from speaking?
No
Neither?
You are free to do anything
And I am
I'm for unlimited positive freedom of every individual
You are free to speak and I am free to beat you up if I want to
You beating me up isnt a positive freedom.
Not for me anyway
I should be free to beat you up
No state to tell me I can't
No, that's assault and many people can die or get seriously injured from that
Doesn't mean I will however
Many people would which is the problem
I don't see many people fighting on the street tho
Pretty peaceful out here
thats because its against the law. Either way I have seen plenty of fights.
Police only punish behaviour they don't prevent it
What do you mean so? I can die or get seriously injured and so could you. Same for your family and friends.
In most cases
Now I highly doubt that
I can self defend
To what extent?
You're not invincible
Of course not
then you should know that there's atleast a possibility that you'd get seriously injured right?
I don't think anyone would have the urge to run a full blown assasination on me
You never know
plenty of people die for many reasons
You could be an unlucky one
They die with police or without
Especially if its not outlawed
Not as much as criminals or potential criminals.