Im against anyone silencing speech.

Speech is to be met with speech

And lack there of will be met with violence

Yes

It will be always met in certain cases with violence

Lucky I dont belong to the British government

Otherwise I;d be an activist against them for violating my speech

If you talk shit I'll beat you up is completly justifiable

State beating you up is not

I'm against objectively deciding what speech you can use violence against and which not

Or if someone talks shit to you just ignore them. No need to beat them up

It's free speech both ways

Which is?

Free speech means the state can't shut it because they have it on a list

Individuals are free to shut your speech if they wish

Sure

shut my speech as in ignore or prevent me from speaking?

No

Neither?

You are free to do anything

And I am

I'm for unlimited positive freedom of every individual

You are free to speak and I am free to beat you up if I want to

You beating me up isnt a positive freedom.

Not for me anyway

I should be free to beat you up

No state to tell me I can't

No, that's assault and many people can die or get seriously injured from that

Doesn't mean I will however

So?

Many people would which is the problem

I don't see many people fighting on the street tho

Pretty peaceful out here

thats because its against the law. Either way I have seen plenty of fights.

Police only punish behaviour they don't prevent it

What do you mean so? I can die or get seriously injured and so could you. Same for your family and friends.

In most cases

Now I highly doubt that

I can self defend

To what extent?

You're not invincible