blame the people still, the only reason the advertisers are there are because people use the app

so dont blame the ceo

there are many other people you should be blaming

it's the enablers, not the man benefitting from them

it may be immoral, but that's how it is

He could still do with pocketing less of it and increase wages or put more money into better working conditions

well people wouldnt work for him if he didnt

so obviously he needs to balance out the funds

It’s not *entirely* his fault, and mostly falls on the system at hand,

yes he just benefits

But he still does have a large amount of money just sitting around that he could be doing a lot of shit with

well yeah of course i agree he shouldn't be pocketing money that could possibly go towards improving the company

exactly how much of that he is doing would be a hard number to calculate

but it's wrong

Not necessarily limited to the company, he could donate more to charity or something

oh well yeah of course that too

"i donated 500k to charity"

thats like .01% of what you earn

lol

Ikr

that pisses me off

That’s half of what you carry around in your fucking wallet every day

lmao

Celebrities are worse with that sort of virtue signalling, CEOs don't do it too often

And when they do, it's usually Bill Gates type CEOs who actually donate a sizable portion of what they earn.

guys please help me
i have read a lot of nrx blogs but i dont even know what it is still

If I was sitting on the impossibly large stack of money that guy is sitting on, I would be a little more fucking modest/humble with it

Maybe fund a few Red Cross missions across the world

at the end of the day though, it is their decision to not donate the money, although we as a society should frown on them for doing it and encourage they donate

Donate 60 bucks to the homeless folks I pass on the street every day, start a charity

We should do that whole capitalism exists

That's hard though Brick, it's hard to talk about other people donating more without sounding either preachy or like a sour, jealous man.

Once it falls we use that wealth to do that shit during the transition from currency to a lack thereof

I think charity loses its moral value if it is extorted and shamed.

*extorted and shamed out of people.

Moral value doesn’t even matter at this point, these people are beyond moral values

What matters is that their wealth is redistributed

Don't call it charity then, call it redistribution of their wealth.

The term charity should be reserved for voluntary giving.

Fair point

hey guys watch this