Message from @comuna redpill
Discord ID: 474937287076216842
its the theory created by theorists such as comte and durkheim
What's the theory?
its basically based on positive affirmations
Im not familiar with Comte or Durkheim
or formal logic
such as
all red crayons are red
but the thing is that this not really apliiable to some modern socialogical principles
including, as you would expect, the socio methabolic structure of capital
they cant accept internal contradictions inside concepts
thus rejecting ontology as a whole
Contradictions like?
they are the extreme opposite of post modernism lets say
Like traditionalism?
not necessarily
Reactionaries?
but like those richard dawkins fanboys
and technocrats
plus social democracy as we know it emerged from positivism
I dont know about that now
Actually nevermind you're right
Noted
he is essentially criticizing a positivist theorist while explaining some dialectical materialist concepts
What was his critiques?
one of his most famous texts "on the origin of the family private property and the state is made from excerpts from anti duhring
@Mr. X to the positivist views of eugen duhring
Not familiar with him either, he's also worth noting then
and why his critiques of marxism were fundamentally wrong
on ontology i already reccomended heavily the ontology of the social being series
I'll definitely need to research both of their critiques.
by lukacs
Also noted
yeah its good to check eugen duhring
although i think you will note how engels overwited him a lot
I havent had much time to read them but I'll do so in the near future
kk
in fact there is a very interesting book on structuralism, positivism and neopositvism by a brazillian marxist too but i dont think it has any translations
@Mr. X and on psychology there are lev vygotsky's works
that can be complemented heavily with the reading of anti duhring for obvious reasons
Understood.