and you forget that the executive power is there to impose morality that has been legislated

then it's social behaviour

what's your point

social behaviour is not morality

what is morality

we all develop social behaviour

morality is by definition the rules that define how we should act

should

yes

social behaviour is how we act without thinking

and through the social contract, those rules are established by the common authority

morality is something you hold as an idea

that idea would have to be imposed upon all consenting members of society by the common authority

well that is something I don't think we should do

rather act by our natural behaviour without moral constraints imposed by authority

oh, you and @Mr. X will be great friends

hahahahah

I like mr e

but he disagrees unfortunately

Why? I dont agree with him.

lmao

^

that's literally nietzsche's stance though

I'm more of max stirner stance on morality

Doubt it considering he has morals

epic

And I dont agree with Max stirner

😦

nietzsche was a primitivist, he despised religion for having weakened man by imposing an artificial morality

he was all for returning to natural action

nietzsche and stirner had similar writings

as in the jungle

I find morals very necessary though

the establishment of morals was actually, in nietzsche's opinon, degeneracy

Dont know of him being a primitivist though

Artificial morals

which he has a point

Especially the christian morals

Which I am quite fond of and follow a lot of

that and Nietszche morals

...