I get the feeling that the distinctions regardless, main point being we're all in one coin.

Isn't all materialist philosophy inherently determisnistic

regardless of ideology to pick

Tru

How do I word this uhhhhh

it's more fatalist than deterministic but its like the same

^ yeh what I was trying to say

It reeks a bit of nihilism

and he likes talking about destiny

Hmmm

As a staunch materialist, I would argue that marxist theory provides a more fatalist approach to our world that is supported by history

Partly fatalist.

Considering, this is purely hypothetical

but to my nihilism is just a way of saying the world is beyond categories, can't we agree on that?

Unless you mean it in a different light

No

or what do yall mean by nihilism

"Fatalism is a philosophical doctrine that stresses the subjugation of all events or actions to destiny" So you mean this one?

The world is a complex organization of energy interacting through space-time

Nothing else

"nihilism"

Well i used that term

In regards to nagarjuna

Because from what I understand

Since all we do is rather pointless regardless of what light we paint ourselves into

comes back into the same ole existential problems of

why not let's get this shit over and smash ourselves

problem solved

But then the gift concept

But scientific categories are all provisional, there's no scientific "knowledge" only predictions within our time-scale

is altogether I'm still trying to comprehend

We don't have a choice regardless #iwanttokillmyself

^

i think the problem is that death is not real

Sure, we can devalue empirics

i think the reason we are here is simply that there is no reason we shouldn't be

all possibilities are actual

so here we are

However, one must also devalue all the information deducted from empirics

We could all be thinking suicides, one day attempting but never being able to meet death or could meet death in a differenct circumstance that is largely not in our control?

Otherwise, that is hypocrisy and opportunism