not the SVDA
okay here's the whole thing all screencapped
study it carefully because there's a test over it on friday
*snap*
and they got it from the soviets
this will make a fine addition to my collection
@DA GOMMIE JOO No, and I cant even read it, the text is too small
if they knew it was wrong then why would they publish it
They didnt
what evidence do you have that proves it’s wrong
@Mr. X I guess you don't know how to click the "show original" button
what more do you know than the CIA
please enlighten me
And like I said even if they did they'd publish it anyway
but then again pushing buttons might be a bit too hard for you
what do you have that the CIA doesn’t
I know that the soviets are an unreliable source, so do they.
why would the CIA publish bad documents
then why would they publish their data
by the way the part i cited was from the USDA not the SVDA
@DA GOMMIE JOO No I do, Im just not assed to see texts out of context. Im not a moron.
but just ignore that
Because they made a mistake obviously. I guess they wanted to be neutral or something. Dont ask me.
how do you know they made a mistake
Plenty of wrong documents are wrong.
are you such an NPC you can’t admit soviets are good
ate good*
Because they got it from the soviets
https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP84B00274R000300150009-5.pdf
show me sources that prove this document wrong
please
No I cant because its not true.
show me what you have that the CIA doesn’t
"hey the soviets gave us wrong data" "better publish it anyway because fuck you"
>hey I know more than the CIA xd
Look at your own source. It says the soviet civilians were polled by the soviets.
>hey the cia was wrong i’m right (no source)
@DA GOMMIE JOO they do that with other documents too
like i said if it was false why would they publish it
mr. e knows more than the central *intelligence* agency but it's a seeeecret
