@DA GOMMIE JOO also you dont have sense, hes not embarrassing himself

when you contradict what everyone else says but as soon as people get technical you suddenly have nothing to say

They dont get technical

>when you get proven wrong on one thing and then proceed to draw your failure out into a massive argument where you do nothing but insult people and act like an imbecile

Thats a strawman TWP

@DA GOMMIE JOO you do that?

I dont

when you deny sources from the US government themselves because they ‘could be wrong, so therefor they’re wrong’

did you just miss the entire argument?

let's go over it here

I dont, I deny them because the source is from the soviets. But you have trouble understanding this.

it’s from the USDA

@DA GOMMIE JOO With you? No thanks.

we’re going in circles here

And the soviets

you admitted it yourself

the part I cited was from the Usda

not the SVDA

okay here's the whole thing all screencapped

study it carefully because there's a test over it on friday

*snap*

and they got it from the soviets

this will make a fine addition to my collection

@DA GOMMIE JOO No, and I cant even read it, the text is too small

if they knew it was wrong then why would they publish it

They didnt

what evidence do you have that proves it’s wrong

@Mr. X I guess you don't know how to click the "show original" button

what more do you know than the CIA

please enlighten me

And like I said even if they did they'd publish it anyway

but then again pushing buttons might be a bit too hard for you

what do you have that the CIA doesn’t

I know that the soviets are an unreliable source, so do they.

why would the CIA publish bad documents

then why would they publish their data

by the way the part i cited was from the USDA not the SVDA

@DA GOMMIE JOO No I do, Im just not assed to see texts out of context. Im not a moron.

but just ignore that

Because they made a mistake obviously. I guess they wanted to be neutral or something. Dont ask me.

how do you know they made a mistake