How did they review the data exactly?

You're just assuming this.

statistical data

show me

USDA: these data are wrong
CIA: publish them anyway
USDA: why
CIA: because we love the soviets and they're our favorite ally
USDA: who the fuck spiked my drink

No, because I dont have any

exactly

and I do

They obviously didnt think the data was wrong

i have evidence and you don’t

oh and here's the CIA lying about the USSR
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v09/v09p305_Marchetti.html

so just fucking admit you’re wrong

Your source is my evidence I said

No because Im not wrong

so you agree that the soviets ate as good as the US then

"I'm not wrong, I just have absolutely no evidence to back me up and make no sense"

"How the CIA Manufactures History" what a very questionable source @DA GOMMIE JOO

did you even read the article

@tao lin No not at all.

>no not at all

>provide a source against that claim

I told you my evidence

>you provide no counter argument

what’s your evidence

it gives a quote from an actual english anti-communist spy in here

I told you my source

the source you posted before, the entire document

that shows that the soviets provided this

brb

so you:
-can't show where the data is wrong
-can't explain why the USDA would publish wrong data
-can't explain how you know the data are wrong
-can't admit that you have nothing to back you up

No I can show it. and I did.
I did.
I did.
I do and did.

you are next level brainlet

Said the 3rd worldist

my source indicates the opposite of your claim

Hail the ooga booga king

you don’t even know what third worldism is

No it doesnt

I do

please explain third worldism

its ooga boogaism

so you know where the data are wrong?
please explain what parts are wrong and how you know that they're wrong