Message from @tao lin
Discord ID: 491703463655505920
That's a whole other incident
"hey our worst enemy who we're committed to destroying just sent us some wrong statistics"
"go ahead and publish them while acting like they're true just to stay neutral"
"but we hate them"
"yeah but we don't hate them enough to lie about them"
"uh yes we do, we did that before"
"SHUT UP AND PUBLISH THE DAMN PAPER"
No they hate them for sure
and they didnt lie about them
Im not the CIA I dont know why they were dumb enough to publish wrong statistics
Or source I mean
>yeah man the USDA reviewed soviet data and they found it was incorrect so they published it anyway
t. you
How did they review the data exactly?
You're just assuming this.
statistical data
show me
USDA: these data are wrong
CIA: publish them anyway
USDA: why
CIA: because we love the soviets and they're our favorite ally
USDA: who the fuck spiked my drink
No, because I dont have any
exactly
and I do
They obviously didnt think the data was wrong
i have evidence and you don’t
oh and here's the CIA lying about the USSR
https://www.ihr.org/jhr/v09/v09p305_Marchetti.html
Your source is my evidence I said
No because Im not wrong
so you agree that the soviets ate as good as the US then
"I'm not wrong, I just have absolutely no evidence to back me up and make no sense"
"How the CIA Manufactures History" what a very questionable source @DA GOMMIE JOO
did you even read the article
>no not at all
>provide a source against that claim
I told you my evidence
>you provide no counter argument
what’s your evidence
it gives a quote from an actual english anti-communist spy in here
I told you my source
the source you posted before, the entire document
that shows that the soviets provided this
brb
so you:
-can't show where the data is wrong
-can't explain why the USDA would publish wrong data
-can't explain how you know the data are wrong
-can't admit that you have nothing to back you up
No I can show it. and I did.
I did.
I did.
I do and did.
you are next level brainlet