Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 500428138757619724


2018-10-12 20:27:40 UTC  

and spears

2018-10-12 20:28:09 UTC  

The Romans rarely used horses *like the Celts*

2018-10-12 20:28:42 UTC  

@Mr. X your a retarded if you thing Celts didn't have sword

2018-10-12 20:28:55 UTC  

They are know for usesing CLEYMORES

2018-10-12 20:29:01 UTC  

I never said they didnt

2018-10-12 20:29:24 UTC  

yes but the romans used the horses more than the celts

2018-10-12 20:29:36 UTC  

Anyway food's getting cold

2018-10-12 20:29:37 UTC  

peace

2018-10-12 20:29:47 UTC  

*50*

2018-10-12 20:30:06 UTC  

Horses were not used as much as you think they were

2018-10-12 20:31:53 UTC  

Guess the Romans are primitive for using better tactics...*Like the Celts*

2018-10-12 20:40:54 UTC  

>By way of stock shares he pushes his way into the circuit of national production which he turns into a purchasable or rather tradeable object, thus robbing the enterprises of the foundation of personal ownership. Between employer and employee there arises that inner estrangement which later leads to a political class division.

2018-10-12 20:41:01 UTC  

Can you guess who?

2018-10-12 20:59:56 UTC  

>The tremendous economic development leads to a social stratification of people. The small craftsman slowly dies out, and as a result the worker's possibility of achieving an independent existence becomes rarer and rarer; in consequence the worker becomes visibly proleterianised. There arises the industrial "factory worker" whose most essential characteristic is the fact that he hardly ever is in a position to found an existence of his own in later life. He is property-less in the truest sense of the word. His old age is a torment and can scarcely be designated as living.

2018-10-12 21:07:37 UTC  

... oof

2018-10-12 21:07:49 UTC  

Fuck is the way you fuck @Deleted User

2018-10-12 21:07:50 UTC  

Lmao

2018-10-12 22:02:04 UTC  

Mr E im not sure I can agree with you there

2018-10-12 22:02:39 UTC  

@Mr. X idiot

2018-10-12 22:02:45 UTC  

no understanding of history

2018-10-12 22:02:45 UTC  

Romans typically used auxiliary as cavalry which was usually composed entirely of celts or Germans

2018-10-12 22:02:50 UTC  

the romans used heavy infantry

2018-10-12 22:03:03 UTC  

the celts use cavalry

2018-10-12 22:03:38 UTC  

t@Deleted User incorrect

2018-10-12 22:03:52 UTC  

Not at all

2018-10-12 22:04:00 UTC  

Romans had their own cavalry too

2018-10-12 22:04:20 UTC  

Auxilia normally consisted of infantry too

2018-10-12 22:04:23 UTC  

But predominantly they relied on foreign auxiliary to constitute the bulwark of their cavalry

2018-10-12 22:04:46 UTC  

light infantry and Calvary

2018-10-12 22:04:47 UTC  

Yeah there were auxiliary slingers swordsman archers javelin throwers and cavalrymen

2018-10-12 22:05:06 UTC  
2018-10-12 22:05:08 UTC  

dummy

2018-10-12 22:05:27 UTC  

my point Is Romans more often delegates the cavalry duties to foreign tribes than organizing it themselves

2018-10-12 22:05:36 UTC  

dont punch each other please!

2018-10-12 22:05:43 UTC  

I’m indirectly agreeing with you, mong

2018-10-12 22:05:44 UTC  

@Deleted User non-citizens

2018-10-12 22:05:47 UTC  

not foreign tribes

2018-10-12 22:05:48 UTC  

idiot

2018-10-12 22:05:59 UTC  

...

2018-10-12 22:06:54 UTC  

some1 ban this fool

2018-10-12 22:06:56 UTC  

lmao