Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 500428904473952257
Mr E im not sure I can agree with you there
@Mr. X idiot
no understanding of history
Romans typically used auxiliary as cavalry which was usually composed entirely of celts or Germans
the romans used heavy infantry
the celts use cavalry
t@Deleted User incorrect
Not at all
Romans had their own cavalry too
Auxilia normally consisted of infantry too
But predominantly they relied on foreign auxiliary to constitute the bulwark of their cavalry
light infantry and Calvary
Yeah there were auxiliary slingers swordsman archers javelin throwers and cavalrymen
@Deleted User shutup
dummy
my point Is Romans more often delegates the cavalry duties to foreign tribes than organizing it themselves
dont punch each other please!
I’m indirectly agreeing with you, mong
@Deleted User non-citizens
not foreign tribes
...
some1 ban this fool
lmao
there's a difference between non-citizens and foreign tribes
I hope you look back and see how much of a non argument that is. So much so that it’s 100% vacuous. You are literally saying the same thing but saying it’s not the same thing
romans Auxilia use light infantry and cavalry
cri about it
dummy
get your facts right
>non citizens aren’t foreigners
hurr durrrr
Your argument is semantical - a totally fucking nonsensical one at that
Is English your first language?
@Deleted User nope
you failed history
Romans used primarily celts Iberians celtiberians numidians Greeks and Germans as cavalry much more than Roman Italians and official Roman legionaries
that’s a historical fact
If you accept it or not that’s on you man
