and yeah still more romans than the celtic plebs

Which was about 50 men

So 50 in an army of 1000

Yeh....

to celts?

what? 5?

No Romans

I know

"50"

Also 50?

Doubt it

highly doubt it

Celts like I said didn't use them

Yes, primitive

Do you even read what I put or are you just a sperg

I do read and no, are you a sperg?

Guess modern militarys are primitive

My dinners getting cold so I gtg soon

Sure

No they arent

Exactly

they dont have swords now

they did back then

and spears

The Romans rarely used horses *like the Celts*

@Mr. X your a retarded if you thing Celts didn't have sword

They are know for usesing CLEYMORES

I never said they didnt

yes but the romans used the horses more than the celts

Anyway food's getting cold

peace

*50*

Horses were not used as much as you think they were

Guess the Romans are primitive for using better tactics...*Like the Celts*

>By way of stock shares he pushes his way into the circuit of national production which he turns into a purchasable or rather tradeable object, thus robbing the enterprises of the foundation of personal ownership. Between employer and employee there arises that inner estrangement which later leads to a political class division.

Can you guess who?

>The tremendous economic development leads to a social stratification of people. The small craftsman slowly dies out, and as a result the worker's possibility of achieving an independent existence becomes rarer and rarer; in consequence the worker becomes visibly proleterianised. There arises the industrial "factory worker" whose most essential characteristic is the fact that he hardly ever is in a position to found an existence of his own in later life. He is property-less in the truest sense of the word. His old age is a torment and can scarcely be designated as living.

... oof

Fuck is the way you fuck @Deleted User

Lmao

Mr E im not sure I can agree with you there