Yeah they rode them alot

they still rode them alot

Obviously the romans had more high ranking officials

*about 1% did yeh<:care:312065869767245835> *

How high ranking?

High ranking people were nobles and there body guards

and yeah still more romans than the celtic plebs

Which was about 50 men

So 50 in an army of 1000

Yeh....

to celts?

what? 5?

No Romans

I know

"50"

Also 50?

Doubt it

highly doubt it

Celts like I said didn't use them

Yes, primitive

Do you even read what I put or are you just a sperg

I do read and no, are you a sperg?

Guess modern militarys are primitive

My dinners getting cold so I gtg soon

Sure

No they arent

Exactly

they dont have swords now

they did back then

and spears

The Romans rarely used horses *like the Celts*

@Mr. X your a retarded if you thing Celts didn't have sword

They are know for usesing CLEYMORES

I never said they didnt

yes but the romans used the horses more than the celts

Anyway food's getting cold

peace

*50*

Horses were not used as much as you think they were

Guess the Romans are primitive for using better tactics...*Like the Celts*

>By way of stock shares he pushes his way into the circuit of national production which he turns into a purchasable or rather tradeable object, thus robbing the enterprises of the foundation of personal ownership. Between employer and employee there arises that inner estrangement which later leads to a political class division.