Message from @Mr. X
Discord ID: 518554483886653475
Said the literal sandnigger who's country is in poverty and hungry as usual
π¦
Nahtzee
so Im researching leninism and I am having trouble with the idea of democratic centralism. It seems like a measure that makes sense in wartime or crisis but not afterwards, and I think after a revolution minority opinions in party debates should be more cared for. The people should not have to completely fall in line and unite behind an action that they dont support just because it won in a slim vote. It sounds like an authoritarian idea that makes sense only in the situation of the russian civil war. Anybody have thoughts on it? I am pretty uneducated so take that in mind
I get "unity in action" but the soviets didnt need to have that after the war, they could have allowed more democratic discourse
Margherita Sarfatti was a good woman
Wrong
theres no such thing as a good fascist
they lack individual competence
DOg stop projecting
Project your cummies onto me daddy
@Shift communism was created to centralize power. marx even admitted that you have to give the state absolute power to "redistribute" the wealth. And then, get this, the state will of its own will stop existing LMAO
@Deleted User π© π© π© π© π¦ π¦ π¦ π© π¦
π« π π« πΆπΌ
π€ π€ π€ π€ π€
is leftypol even leftist lmao
I see u guys way more often so far
This server?
ye
leftypol is leftist
you cna create your own channel @Shift
on this server
ban right-wing cucks like @Mr. X
"right wing cucks"
that seems ironic
isnt cuck a right wing thing
ah ye
ur a right wing cuck too
lol
lmao
Said the paki
And no its not
giving your earnings to the government is real cuckery
Anyone exposed to anything other than an echochamber isnt going to stay left wing
@PugSlugger says the ancap wannabe
You wanna be an ancap but youβre just a petty natcap
Fuck ancap lol
You guys are fags that ban people for asking legitimate questions