Message from @Buy me a pc
Discord ID: 520493180962078721
You didn’t mention anything about quality
You debunked literally nothing
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women.
Well developers would be making games they want to make without worrying about pleasing stockholders and such.
Exactly
Why should stockholders and the like be rewarded more than the actual people who made the game?
They contributed no work to it
No labour value whatsoever
If you don’t like a game
Then don’t buy it
How did that work for EA?
You're still strawmanning
Lol
There’s YouTube and reviews for a reason
No I’m debunking the stockholders bs
You're attacking literally no part of my argument
Sounds like motivation
But you’re implying shit like micro transactions and shit being littered in games
For that sole purpose
Wow some people put in $1000 dollars of their billions of dollars
@Borzo they identified a trend or reputation in the company and thus, invested
They contributed no labour effort at all
They did not work
They are lazy
And they are rewarded for their laziness
They identified patterns and took a risk
Meanwhile, those who actually worked on the games still are poor
And the rich get richer
An educated guess
Making money off of risks and not hard work is fair lmao
The game industry is also utterly lacking in workers rights. You can find so many stories on working overtime and being on time crunches to appease investors to get a game out.
Workers should be funded by the state, in which if the game would be a hit, the worker would be rewarded
Instead of profit holders
@Borzo who cares what’s fair
Anyone could do it
And people who didn't contribute to the game at all except in money
Just stop being poor
Lol
Just stop being dumb
Just stop being ignorant