Message from @Borzo
Discord ID: 520492457750822913
That's not a bad idea. I would if I had 2.
Oh wait good games won’t exist under communism because any shitty game designer can make the same amount as an actually good one
Strawman
Tetris is an outlier btw
Good games hardly exist now
@Borzo I debunked you with resources
You really did the opposite tbh
The reason why the bourgeoisie lose their wealth is because competition
Instead of people who don't even work on the game making the profit, it's the game designers themselves being rewarded 😮
Even if it’s shitty 🤔
Nope
Yep
You're just strawmanning at this point
Bruh
I debunked 1 thing
Communist games would probably be a lot better seeing how the industry currently is. They just want to cash in on trends.
Your attempt to debunk communist games is fake
No u
You didn’t mention anything about quality
Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women.
Well developers would be making games they want to make without worrying about pleasing stockholders and such.
Exactly
Why should stockholders and the like be rewarded more than the actual people who made the game?
They contributed no work to it
No labour value whatsoever
If you don’t like a game
Then don’t buy it
How did that work for EA?
You're still strawmanning
Lol
There’s YouTube and reviews for a reason
No I’m debunking the stockholders bs
You're attacking literally no part of my argument
Sounds like motivation
But you’re implying shit like micro transactions and shit being littered in games
For that sole purpose
Wow some people put in $1000 dollars of their billions of dollars
Not how it works, it’s supposed to be what the consumers wants remember
@Borzo they identified a trend or reputation in the company and thus, invested