No u

You didn’t mention anything about quality

You debunked literally nothing

Bourgeois marriage is, in reality, a system of wives in common and thus, at the most, what the Communists might possibly be reproached with is that they desire to introduce, in substitution for a hypocritically concealed, an openly legalised community of women.

Well developers would be making games they want to make without worrying about pleasing stockholders and such.

Exactly

Why should stockholders and the like be rewarded more than the actual people who made the game?

They contributed no work to it

No labour value whatsoever

If you don’t like a game

Then don’t buy it

How did that work for EA?

You're still strawmanning

Lol

There’s YouTube and reviews for a reason

No I’m debunking the stockholders bs

You're attacking literally no part of my argument

Sounds like motivation

But you’re implying shit like micro transactions and shit being littered in games

For that sole purpose

Wow some people put in $1000 dollars of their billions of dollars

Not how it works, it’s supposed to be what the consumers wants remember

@Borzo they identified a trend or reputation in the company and thus, invested

They contributed no labour effort at all

They did not work

They are lazy

And they are rewarded for their laziness

They identified patterns and took a risk

Meanwhile, those who actually worked on the games still are poor

And the rich get richer

An educated guess

Making money off of risks and not hard work is fair lmao

The game industry is also utterly lacking in workers rights. You can find so many stories on working overtime and being on time crunches to appease investors to get a game out.

Workers should be funded by the state, in which if the game would be a hit, the worker would be rewarded

Instead of profit holders

@Borzo who cares what’s fair

Anyone could do it

And people who didn't contribute to the game at all except in money

Just stop being poor

Lol

Just stop being dumb