Message from @Deimos-MI
Discord ID: 417557328124968960
going good
We need swat shields
in every class room
I need some white pills fam
Wow, good job, bud. You looked up the full names of my mother and sisters. Great work, you contemptible, human equivalent of a ingrown toenail. Glad you accomplished that.
I hate when people try to go for family
That blonde is a damn white-presenting Jew
I fucking disdain that shit
What's the username?
quality shitposting π
lol
What in tarnation
__
|. |________
|. \
ββββββ-
|. In this. |
|. House we. |βββββ|
|. |. |
|deny the |
|holocaust. |arbeit macht
? Frie
@Thomas Ryan, that's unfortunate. Anyone who has their family doxxed must be moving up the white-nationalist food chain.
I guess it would be more a hierarchy than a food chain..
https://twitter.com/Eric_StrikerDS/status/966975619153178626
`America is fat and tacky.`
He's saying you can't be revolutionary and American, in spite of Americans being revolutionary by nature. I genuinely find it hard to understand how someone is supposed to love their heritage, culture, history, extended family, and homeland without actually loving their nation, which is America. America is a nation, the United States is a government.
I cannot think of a single far-right and/or nationalistic force that found victory by completely setting aside everything that made them who they were. Only Marxist regimes have gone so far as to restructure countries around rewritten history, and artificial idols.
American identity has been forged in the flames of rebellion; from the American Revolution; Civil War; up until multiculturalism. To rebel against what is unholy; and evil is the duty of the white man. The idea that Americana has to be tossed, and replaced with European Identitarianism is insane
Striker isn't an Identitarian. Even so, Identitarians are far more likely to embrace their national identity, and cultural heritage far more than he.
βFat, and Tackyβ is a stupid critique. Embrace Americanism; but not really modern Americanism; but 1950βs Americana
He's more on the side of revolutionary NatSoc, which ends up being so revolutionary as to resemble Marxism in form and being in regards to the scale of social conditioning needed for society to be "good".