Message from @whiic
Discord ID: 650592895413518366
And I'm pretty damn sure no-one **needs** a top hat with pink corset.
And depending on the mood of Dear Leader, it's questionable if they even need food.
Yeah these people like to play dress up A LOT. They also have weird, abnormal behaviors.
The hat is just bad optics, I disavow
But if we thought sargon was a fucking idiot for gamer gate 2.0
Whew
**gamer gate 2.0 but with communism**
Lmao, give me a minute to start unpacking this
First of all, wouldn’t they be the people that would side with Anita and Zoe? Which in turn, would be with the gaming media defending them. Aren’t they the leftists and feminists? How do they reconcile that?
Second of all, gamer gate was about shitty practices that corporations had, true. However, inserting communism isn’t going to work, considering that this was specifically against bad practices and not the existence of corporations themselves. Perhaps this could have worked if you played the long game but, again, the people are revolting against left wing ideology.
And finally, this happened 2013/2014, there is no long game with this. This happened 5/6 years ago. You can’t repeat that unless you recreate the prefect conditions for it, which you don’t have that power.
Communists have no understanding of how money works
Or the economy at large
Otherwise they would likely not be commies
@snake The biggest irony with "Gamergate 2.0 but with Communism" is probably the very idea of communist video games. I cannot imagine a supply for video games that would actually entertain the populace.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B0WhdhbImLM
I do admit that Pyongyang Racer does produce some unintentional comedy...
I mean, what if your dictator told you to enjoy it? Do you have a choice?
Capability to make choices is prerequisite of free markets. You cannot have those.
Thus GG with Communism makes sense. You WILL enjoy it.
Clanker
🥄
It's funny how feminism has reached even DPRK, with objectifying stare.
Only the pudgy potato sack gets to look at the women.
convo on a new type of goverment with a free market and smaller gov in other (pol) chat. You can come in for points of reference and small questions. Other than that please have yourself muted
"Only the pudgy potato sack gets to look at the women."
The scary part is that with the food scarcity DPRK, most people staring at the police lady would probably eat her (the more literal way).
> Alexander Hamilton 1802 on the dangers of mass migration: "To admit foreigners indiscriminately...would be nothing less, than to admit the Grecian Horse into the Citadel of our Liberty & Sovereignty." #AmericaFirst
What, he debated someone again?
Again? Sargon or Vaush?
Well, in this instance, both.
Thought Sargon retired from debates cause he got rekt so often
It seems video and audio gets seriously out-of-synch in just a few minutes into the stream.
Well.. it wasnt a debate but a whinefest about words
Sargon getting rekt... hmmm... I mean, I remember him vs. Kristi Winters with him losing before debate started due to frame game (i.e definiting winning conditions so that Sargon had burden of proof, then getting gish-galloped with dozen feminist studies).
I don't consider some of the most notorious "rekt" moments like Sargon vs. Spencer to be a "Sargon eternally pwned". It was Spencer being a slimy shitfuck and not answering even the simplest of questions.
TIL a new term
https://gyazo.com/fa08f390b4e664a0352b4f0510fcfe0c
Sargon doesn't do very well in formal debates because in formal debates, you don't debate with honesty (i.e trying to argue with the opponent, rather you try to win the audience, and you do it within rules and preset goals).