Message from @JaceRex
Discord ID: 654596883297075201
even if it is true that there is a correlation race and IQ, it makes people resentful and prevents them from being motivated to work hard to improve themselves.
I believe that mentioning it is a bad tactic to actually resolve the issues of poverty
@gNightrow But saying that you live in a white supremacist society that will never let you success encourages self-improvement more?
just because data can be the absolute truth that doesn't mean that it is useful/ helpful to know about.
And living in belief that you are in white supremacy does ... not cause resentment?
I think "shit happens, you are born dumb" is less causal to resentment than "whitey oppress you".
as I said, earlier: "two things can be true at once, there is no real racism happening to oppress other races and there is no correlation between race and IQ. Internal culture problems and illnesses could be the other factors that limit a race's potential.
maybe the illnesses could be tied to race."
If you get rid of the actual explanation, establishment being white supremacy is the inevitable conclusion.
And then you have BLM.
And you encourage the whitey to become nazis for self-defensive reasons: killing niggers becomes justified because niggers hate you and they want to kill you.
And all this just because you cannot admit the fact that niggers are dumb.
I agree there is no real racism happening in modern day but by mentioning race realism is causing the opposite effect than what is intended because the mass majority of people take things at face value.
There are less provocative/ more tactical ways to get people to understand your point of view. we need to talk more about things that are more easily understandable to be true.
Oooo I do like this.
@whiic Michael Woodley has done peer reviewed work on spiteful mutants
Does anyone know which channels fell to the recent banwave?
If you identify as alt-anything, you're probably gay
@gNightrow IQ is the number one predictor for success in life, it's even stronger than *actual education.* IQ stacks the odds because it can apply to a ton of different things in life, unlike education which is mostly specific to one area at a time. With higher IQ many other things tend to go up (education, status, wealth, etc.) This, statistically speaking, results in people having more stable, happy lives, and lower rates of crime, addiction, etc.
IQ is heritable by at least 40% and could be as high as 80% (the exact number is unclear).
Since IQ is heritable, this means that, even in broken homes, over the generations demographics with higher IQ will outperform those with lower IQ, because as explained IQ is the number one predictor for success. So even if a demographic with higher IQ came from dysfunctional/broken homes, their chances to increase the success of their family tree as the generations go by are much greater than of people with lower IQ, even if that second demographic came from functional/healthy homes.
So it is extremely unlikely that black people should under equal circumstances demonstrate the same IQ as white people, because their economic status and family status should reflect that more and more over time. But we actually see the opposite happening.
Circumstances have equalized more and more for all people, yet crime rates have proportionally increased for black people.
And their economic status has also barely budged I believe?
Note that I'm not saying the science is settled by any means, not by a longshot. We could certainly still discover that the IQ of different demographics should be higher/lower when correcting for all the circumstancial differences.
My take is mostly probabilistic, it's not provable like gravity.
So I think policy making should not reflect the findings, they should simply be straight forward: treat all humans equal
Under the law, that is
it probably doesnt help that culturally they dont support intelligence
Diane Abbott turns up to a polling station with odd shoes and they're on the wrong feet
Imagine unironically being Alt-anything
Yeah I guess I'm an ***aLt-CeNtRiSt***
Liberal? Nah.
Liberalist <:sargonfingerguns:568463117856669696>
The term “alt lite” or alt anything is cringy and gay btw
Liberalisticismitism is best
***ALT-LIBERAL***


