Message from @Sarahdale

Discord ID: 650954364545925120


2019-12-02 06:58:21 UTC  

There is no way U.S. citizen soldiers are going to gun down civilians while the govt. is in breech of the constitution.

2019-12-02 06:58:24 UTC  

Dude as someone who has seen when shit gets real everyone thinks they have a pair of balls till they don't- and then I laugh at them <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-12-02 06:58:28 UTC  

@A Big Gay Baby sure buddy.

2019-12-02 06:58:29 UTC  

@Tubby the Skelly Bones that would be correct for many middle east countries. But vastly inaccurate here

2019-12-02 06:58:33 UTC  

would you?

2019-12-02 06:58:43 UTC  

Quick search, I've heard of them before.. but that's about the length of it.

2019-12-02 06:58:53 UTC  

@Storin blackpilled

2019-12-02 06:58:55 UTC  

Western militaries will NEVER be used to occupy their own countries tbh- the ethics training means they will never pull the trigger on their own people, the police on the other hand...

2019-12-02 06:59:02 UTC  

Also, Applebee's instead of Denny's.

2019-12-02 06:59:04 UTC  

@Storin I was thinking of strapping explosives and chemical weapons to yourself and rigging them to go off when your heart stops.

2019-12-02 06:59:17 UTC  

Instead of brandishing firearms

2019-12-02 06:59:19 UTC  

I mean, sure why not, im down, if it im dead I wont care <:shrug:349342983763656705>

2019-12-02 06:59:23 UTC  

The entire reason the EU wants an army is to get troops from one country to put down rebellions in another.

2019-12-02 06:59:28 UTC  

Exactly

2019-12-02 06:59:31 UTC  

@Laucivol they refuse orders that violate the constitution. Like real concentration camps and gun confiscation without reason.

2019-12-02 06:59:37 UTC  

That's the gist.

2019-12-02 06:59:56 UTC  

Militaries don't supress their own people and tbh in such a revolution it is likely the military will side with the people and the police with the govt

2019-12-02 06:59:58 UTC  

Hence the oath you took in basic @Laucivol

2019-12-02 07:00:07 UTC  

The British always did that which is why we are not called the "royal" army

2019-12-02 07:00:09 UTC  

They keep that oath

2019-12-02 07:00:14 UTC  

@Storin October 1970 in Quebec would disagree

2019-12-02 07:00:18 UTC  

@Storin lol no

2019-12-02 07:00:32 UTC  

British people would be slaughtered

2019-12-02 07:00:32 UTC  

did canada do something naughty?

2019-12-02 07:00:35 UTC  

Yea, we lost the royal affix as a "disgrace" for our treason in the civil war

2019-12-02 07:00:44 UTC  

I made an oath, I will keep it. Is where I stand on that matter. @Louis

2019-12-02 07:00:45 UTC  

Siding with cromwell <:pot_of_kek:544849795433496586>

2019-12-02 07:00:46 UTC  

tbh i wonder why canada even has an army

2019-12-02 07:00:48 UTC  

Any military who suppresses their own people was never for the people to begin with

2019-12-02 07:00:51 UTC  

cromwell was the good guy

2019-12-02 07:01:03 UTC  

@Laucivol than you are an oath keeper by definition.

2019-12-02 07:01:08 UTC  

well it depends on the military

2019-12-02 07:01:12 UTC  

Militaries absolutely suppress their own people.
As a rule.
They always have.
They always will.

The US is the only country that, so far, fucking fingers crossed... has broken that rule.

2019-12-02 07:01:16 UTC  

private mercenary militaries exists

2019-12-02 07:01:17 UTC  

Royal navy, royal airforce, british army

2019-12-02 07:01:38 UTC  

hippity hoppity this is now the minutemen's property

2019-12-02 07:01:42 UTC  

the airforce is an offshoot of the army though

2019-12-02 07:01:43 UTC  

militaries oppress their own people when warrior becomes it's own class

2019-12-02 07:01:46 UTC  

The UK hasn't really broken that rule since the troubles tbh, and even that is debateably not British

2019-12-02 07:01:50 UTC  

lol